Common Planet is tackling the kind of mission that wins or loses on governance: a new economic architecture (Creditism), a new currency model (Credit currency), and a shift of “common resources” into community stewardship. That’s systems-change work—multi-stakeholder, politically sensitive, technically complex, and prone to drift if the operating model isn’t crystal clear, measurable, and transparent. This is exactly where the Project Health Control (PHC) Service plugs in: not as a separate “side project,” but as the governance and monitoring layer that keeps Common Planet’s initiatives coherent, evidence-driven, and trusted as they scale.
The PHC Service provides a disciplined way to turn ideals into an operating system. It establishes a live, structured view of what is planned, what is happening, what is blocked, what is at risk, and what proof exists—so decision-making stays grounded in reality rather than narratives. PHC does this through a consistent set of controls (often captured as SCALPED: Schedule, Concerns, Actions, Locations, People, Events, Deliverables), supported by a transparent reporting rhythm. The result is a practical framework for coordination across teams and communities, while preserving the openness and truth-sharing that Common Planet sees as the foundation for human thriving.
Most importantly, PHC aligns naturally with Common Planet’s core values:
- Sovereignty: PHC makes responsibilities explicit and visible, so individuals and local groups can act with clarity and self-determination—without hidden dependency on “central keepers of the plan.”
- Opportunity: PHC highlights access gaps and delivery bottlenecks early, so participation and resource pathways can be widened deliberately rather than accidentally restricted.
- Stewardship: PHC tracks commitments, resource decisions, and outcomes over time, creating an auditable trail that supports responsible management for present and future generations.
- Community: PHC enables collaborative decision-making with a shared “single source of truth,” reducing conflict, rumor, and fragmentation—because everyone can see the same facts, concerns, and progress.
- In short: Common Planet defines the destination; PHC makes the journey governable.
This proposal introduces how the PHC Service will be applied to Common Planet to strengthen transparency, coordination, and delivery confidence—so the movement can grow without losing integrity, coherence, or trust.
Common Planet is a nonprofit advancing Creditism, an evolutionary economic system. It replaces debt-based money with Credit currency and shifts common resources to community stewardship. These changes distribute both economic power and access to resources more broadly across society. By decentralizing control over shared resources and currency creation, it eliminates debt, taxes, inequality, and scarcity while ending poverty and warfare. Common Planet believes an open, truthful, data-sharing community is the necessary foundation for human thriving.
At its core, Common Planet values:
Sovereignty: Individual empowerment and self-determination.
Opportunity: Equal access to resources and opportunities for all.
Stewardship: Responsible resource management for present and future generations.
Community: Collaborative decision-making and shared responsibility for collective well-being.
The project will be delivered through the standard three-phase Project Health Control (PHC) deployment model. Each phase is designed to add structured governance, reduce risk, and establish mechanisms for traceable value contribution, without placing unnecessary burden on participants or host agencies.
- Pre-start 7-Day Review: PHC Tooling used to produce a ‘green light’ Report.
- Setup Phase: A rapid 2-month deployment of core PHC Systems.
- Continuation Phase: A renewable 12-month operational period focused on scalability and localized implementation.
Timeline: 1 Week
Focus: Diagnostic review to confirm feasibility, define participant roles, and assess pilot readiness.
Activities:
- Conduct stakeholder briefings to introduce PHC methodology.
Identify suitable host location(s) and participant recruitment strategy.
- Perform SCALPED-based analysis to review concerns, actions, stakeholder fit, and expected deliverables.
- Align with [project owner/sponsor] compliance requirements and ensure non-interference with UC eligibility.
- Produce a “Go / No-Go” advisory report, including:
- Risk map
- Participant role profiles
- Timeline for Setup Phase
- Baseline concerns register
Deliverables:
- PHC 7-Day Review Report (with SCALPED indicators)
- Draft stakeholder map and engagement plan
- Participant intake strategy
- Pilot budget confirmation aligned to Appendix 6 cost model
- A "Go / No-Go" advisory summary
Timeline: 2 Months
Focus: Onboarding and setup of PHC systems, consultant induction, and local engagement.
Activities:
- Finalise list of participants and assign Trainee roles.
- Deploy PHC Timechunk tracking system and assign access credentials.
- Conduct orientation and light training for participants (e.g. PHC Portal usage, activity recording).
- Define expected hour allocations (e.g. 33–36 hours/month).
- Appoint PHC Mentors and Consultant oversight team.
- Engage local host organisation for logistical and moral support.
Deliverables:
- Fully operational PHC dashboard for tracking
- Trainee onboarding complete, with assigned goals
- Risk mitigation plan (live)
- Public communication materials (optional)
Timeline: 3 Months (Renewable)
Focus: Real-time monitoring, adaptive support, and data gathering for public value evaluation.
Activities:
- Weekly tracking of Trainee time entries and issue logging
- Monthly reviews with Mentors and participating bodies
- Performance-based progression to Admin level (optional)
- Evaluation of participant satisfaction, skill acquisition, and system integrity
- Prepare summary reporting for funders, public bodies, or potential scale-up discussion
Deliverables:
- Regular Project Health Reports and Performance Reviews.
- Scalable team structure, with additional Consultants deployed as needed.
- Annual Stakeholder Review and Renewal Plan.
A single, live “source of truth” for Common Planet initiatives (plans, deliverables, owners, dates, evidence).
Clear governance and decision pathways: who decides what, when, and using which criteria.
Early-warning visibility of risks and blockers via a structured Concerns register (before they become failures or conflict).
Higher delivery reliability: improved follow-through on actions, milestones, and promised outputs.
Traceable stewardship of resources and commitments (auditable records of decisions, allocations, and outcomes).
Reduced fragmentation and internal friction through shared reporting rhythms and transparent accountability.
Stronger credibility with stakeholders (members, partners, funders, policymakers) through evidence-backed reporting.
Scalable community coordination: the ability to onboard new teams/chapters without losing consistency or integrity.
Better measurement of progress against the mission (what changed, for whom, and what proof exists).
A replicable governance template that can be applied across pilots, regions, and partner projects.
(*2) PHC People Costs [Review=M1, Setup=M2,3, Continuation=M4,5,6]
| Role |
People |
Hourly Rate |
M1 |
M2 |
M3 |
M4 |
M5 |
M6 |
Total (GBP) |
| PHC Strategist |
David Winter |
£12.60 |
10 |
8 |
8 |
8 |
8 |
8 |
£630 |
| PHC Analyst |
Abubakr Harakat |
£8.40 |
5 |
16 |
16 |
16 |
16 |
16 |
£714 |
| PHC Admin |
PHC Admin |
£4.90 |
5 |
24 |
24 |
24 |
24 |
24 |
£613 |
| PHC Trainee |
[name1]
[name2]
[name3] |
£1.68 |
0 |
48 |
48 |
72 |
72 |
72 |
£524 |
| Common Planet Leaders |
Remzi Bajrami
Adelina Bajrami
[name3] |
£8.40 |
10 |
72 |
72 |
72 |
72 |
72 |
£3,108 |
| Total |
|
£403 |
£1,643 |
£1,643 |
£1,986 |
£1,986 |
£1,986 |
£9,646 |