PHC Port | My Plate | Order Efficiency

Ask Chet to review this proposal

Chet is typing...

Project: Intergenerational Living Development

Proposal for PHC Service

Intergenerational Living Development is a PHC-serviced project to investigate, develop and demonstrate a repeatable model for high-quality, affordable intergenerational housing. The concept begins with the possibility of two or more related households living within a deliberately designed residential environment that provides both genuine independence and selected shared facilities. An initial architectural concept uses an H-shaped arrangement, with separate residential wings for different generations connected by shared living space and opening towards common outdoor facilities. This is an initial design hypothesis rather than a prescribed solution. The wider project will examine how architecture, land use, shared infrastructure, financing, ownership, legal structures and community arrangements could combine to provide younger households with secure and attractive homes while enabling older generations to contribute capital and remain independent, involved and supported. The intention is to develop more than a single family home. The project will investigate whether the principles can be turned into a repeatable development model capable of supporting individual family projects, multi-family communities and larger developments in the UK and internationally. PHC Service will maintain the project evidence base, Concerns, Actions, decisions, specialist inputs, lessons learned and readiness information. Architects, planners, lawyers, financial advisers, developers, engineers and other disciplines will remain independent specialist services contributing to the project as required.

📄 The Story of PHC

[+] PHC Proposal

This proposal offers the Project Health Control (PHC) Service for Project 519, Intergenerational Living Development.

The project is not yet a settled development scheme. Sponsorship, governance, site, planning route, tenure model, operating model, funding and cost baseline are not yet established. That is why PHC is useful now: it provides a disciplined way to hold early assumptions, Concerns, Actions, People, Events, Deliverables and evidence together before decisions harden.

PHC will help the project move from concept enthusiasm to controlled feasibility, so leadership can see what is known, what remains unproven, what needs specialist input and what decision should be made next.

[+] Project Summary

The Intergenerational Living Development project is intended to test a housing model that supports younger and older generations in a more practical way than conventional separate housing or informal multi-generational living. The project should explore privacy, independence, shared facilities, affordability, ownership, funding, planning, safety, long-term maintenance and operational responsibility.

At this stage, the project should not be presented as a finished scheme. PHC is proposed as the control method for shaping the feasibility work, making unresolved issues visible and producing evidence suitable for a later business case, funding discussion or responsible stop/redesign decision.

The proposal covers the PHC Service only. It does not provide architectural certification, planning approval, legal advice, funding guarantees, land acquisition, construction delivery or housing management services.

[+] Involved Parties

The precise parties will be confirmed during mobilisation, but the PHC Service is expected to operate across the following early interfaces:

  • Project Initiator and Sponsor Representative - currently expected to include David Winter while formal sponsorship is confirmed.
  • Future Accountable Sponsor or Steering Group - responsible for mandate, approvals, funding decisions and acceptance of feasibility outputs.
  • Prospective Residents and Family Participants - younger households, older-generation participants and any wider family members affected by privacy, ownership or support expectations.
  • Planning, Design and Technical Advisers - providing early review of site, design, regulation, accessibility, safety and buildability issues.
  • Finance, Legal and Tenure Advisers - testing affordability, funding routes, ownership structures, resident rights and commercial risks.
  • Local Authority, Neighbours and Community Stakeholders - providing planning, housing-need and local impact context where a site or locality is identified.
  • Potential Operators or Housing Partners - advising on long-term management, maintenance, resident eligibility and service standards where applicable.

[+] Operational Strategy & Project Phases

Operational Strategy

The project will be supported through the standard three-phase Project Health Control deployment model. Each phase is designed to increase clarity, reduce premature commitment and build a maintained evidence base for responsible feasibility decisions.

  • Phase 1 - Verification Preview (7-Day Review) - a short review of the project concept, current records, assumptions, immediate Concerns, stakeholder position and readiness for controlled setup.
  • Phase 2 - Setup and Mobilisation - establishment of PHC records, governance rhythm, action ownership, risk and assumptions control, evidence standards and initial option-testing structure.
  • Phase 3 - Embedded Oversight - continuing support for feasibility evidence, decision tracking, stakeholder feedback, progress reporting and adaptation as the project moves toward a business-case or stop/redesign decision.

The operating principle is that PHC should make Project 519 easier to govern, easier to explain and harder to drift into unevidenced commitments.

Phase 1: 7-Day Review

Timeline: 1 week

Focus: Confirm whether Project 519 has enough clarity, sponsorship and information access to justify structured feasibility mobilisation.

Activities:

  • Review available project records, questions, strategic plan, manifesto, business case and 90-day plan.
  • Map initial Concerns, Actions, People, Events, Deliverables and evidence gaps using the PHC method.
  • Identify immediate gaps in sponsorship, governance, design assumptions, affordability, planning, legal structure and operating model.
  • Produce a concise Go / No-Go advisory report with recommended next steps for setup.

Phase 2: Setup Phase

Timeline: 2 months

Focus: Put the PHC operating structure in place so the intergenerational living concept can be tested, tracked and reported consistently.

Activities:

  • Confirm participating roles, nominated users, review responsibilities and escalation route.
  • Configure PHC records for Concerns, Actions, Deliverables, assumptions, decisions, meetings, stakeholders and evidence links.
  • Onboard users into agreed PHC Portal working practices.
  • Define the reporting cadence, evidence requirements and monthly review structure.
  • Create the first operational baseline for project status, open Concerns, priority Actions and unresolved feasibility questions.

Phase 3: Continuation Phase

Timeline: 3 months, renewable by agreement

Focus: Maintain project-health visibility as feasibility work develops across design, affordability, legal, planning, stakeholder and operating-model questions.

Activities:

  • Maintain live registers for Concerns, Actions, decisions, assumptions, deliverables, stakeholder inputs and supporting evidence.
  • Track follow-through on agreed feasibility activities and highlight stalled or weakly evidenced items.
  • Prepare regular project-health reporting for sponsor, advisers and decision-makers.
  • Support adaptation of the PHC structure as options, stakeholders or evidence requirements change.
  • Build an evidence trail suitable for business-case, funding, planning-readiness and lessons-learned discussions.

[+] Expected Outcomes

The expected outcomes of applying the PHC Service to Project 519 include:

  • A clear project-health evidence base connecting stakeholders, assumptions, Concerns, Actions, decisions, deliverables and feasibility evidence.
  • Improved decision visibility showing what is known, what is not yet established and what must be resolved before development commitments are made.
  • Stronger sponsor and funder confidence through structured reporting and traceable evidence.
  • Better stakeholder coordination by reducing reliance on informal conversations, scattered notes and untracked commitments.
  • A controlled feasibility route from concept to preferred option, redesign, further investigation or stop decision.
  • A reusable project model that could support future intergenerational living projects if Project 519 proves viable.

[+] 6-Month Forecast

CategoryMonth 1Month 2Month 3Month 4Month 5Month 6Total
People - 7-Day Review3,042000003,042
People - Setup011,605000011,605
People - Continuation0011,60512,04912,049035,703
People - Maintenance0000012,04912,049
Hardware001,4420001,442
IT Services and Tooling0001,900001,900
Miscellaneous01,00000001,000
TOTAL3,04212,60513,04713,94912,04912,04966,741
PHC Profit7903,0143,0143,1303,1303,13016,208
Agency Markup2771,0551,0551,0951,0951,0955,672

[+] Cost Breakdown - Hardware

CategoryDescriptionTotal Cost
Single Board Computer Set x5 x5Raspberry Pi 500, mouse, HDMI cable and power cable£722
Monitor x5 x5Mini-monitor for RP500£480
Site UPS x1Uninterruptible Power Supply for site computers£240
£1,442

[+] Cost Breakdown - People

Role People Hourly RateM1M2M3M4M5M6Total (GBP)
[1] PHC Strategist David Winter £138.6010
£1,386
(£900)
8
£1,109
(£720)
8
£1,109
(£720)
8
£1,109
(£720)
8
£1,109
(£720)
8
£1,109
(£720)
50
£6,930
(£4,500)
[2] PHC Analyst PHC Analyst £92.405
£462
(£300)
16
£1,478
(£960)
16
£1,478
(£960)
16
£1,478
(£960)
16
£1,478
(£960)
16
£1,478
(£960)
85
£7,854
(£5,100)
[3] PHC Admin PHC Admin £53.905
£270
(£175)
24
£1,294
(£840)
24
£1,294
(£840)
24
£1,294
(£840)
24
£1,294
(£840)
24
£1,294
(£840)
125
£6,738
(£4,375)
[4] PHC Trainee [name 1] £18.48010
£185
(£120)
10
£185
(£120)
10
£185
(£120)
10
£185
(£120)
10
£185
(£120)
50
£924
(£600)
[4] PHC Trainee [name 2] £18.48048
£887
(£576)
48
£887
(£576)
72
£1,331
(£864)
72
£1,331
(£864)
72
£1,331
(£864)
312
£5,766
(£3,744)
[5] Project Staff Project 519 sponsor / project representative £92.4010
£924
(£600)
72
£6,653
(£4,320)
72
£6,653
(£4,320)
72
£6,653
(£4,320)
72
£6,653
(£4,320)
72
£6,653
(£4,320)
370
£34,188
(£22,200)
PHC Provider Markup£790£3,014£3,014£3,130£3,130£3,130£16,208
Agent Markup£277£1,055£1,055£1,095£1,095£1,095£5,673
Total 30
£3,042
(£1,975)
178
£11,605
(£7,536)
178
£11,605
(£7,536)
202
£12,049
(£7,824)
202
£12,049
(£7,824)
202
£12,049
(£7,824)
992 hrs
£62,399
(£40,519)