Description:
Kent Police have issued a Single Justice Procedure Notice (SJP) for an alleged offence of exceeding a variable speed limit. The enforcement process has been conducted without due process, transparency, or lawful justification, relying on intimidation, financial coercion, and flawed legal premises.
Reformation is needed for removal from the proces of intimidation tactics, lack of due process, financial exploitation and refusal to engage in legitimate dialogue.
Desired Outcome:
Transparency on enforcement policy and a formal response to key legal objections raised in related correspondence.
Compensation for time and resources expended on responding to these legal defects, as invoiced.
What Could Go Wrong:
1. Proceeding to court without proper due process. 2. Illegitimate imposition of increased financial penalties. 3. Kent Police could continue to ignore legitimate objections, reinforcing a pattern of abuse. 4. Escalation without resolution, requiring further external intervention (legal, media, advocacy group involvement).
Current Situation:
SJP Notice received on 07 March 2025.
Letter 5 (Response to SJP) prepared and ready for submission on 24 March 2025, rejecting the process as invalid.
Ongoing assessment of potential legal counteraction or public exposure of procedural misconduct.
Action Strategy:
1. Submit Letter 5 rejecting the SJP process and asserting invoice for incurred costs.
2. Document all correspondence and track responses for a later escalation if required.
3. Develop a bespoke PHC Concerns Register for ongoing monitoring.
4. If unresolved, escalate via public channels (legal action, media, public records request).
5. Consider a campaign exposing the financial nature of speed enforcement schemes if necessary.
Concern Category:
Location:
Analysis: Open Mindmap for C00018
| Snapshot History |
|---|
| C00018_250413.pdf |
| C00018_250324.pdf |
| C00018_250321.pdf |
| C00018_241011.pdf |