Description:
Participants are unsure what information will be captured, how it will be written up on PHC Port, who will be able to see it, and how confidentiality/anonymity will be protected.
Desired Outcome:
A clear, agreed information-governance agreement for PHC Port entries: what is collected, how it’s stored, how it’s anonymised, who can access it (private/group/public), and how consent works.
What Could Go Wrong:
Sensitive details are published (even indirectly) and a contributor is identifiable; loss of trust and withdrawal; reputational damage to PHC Port and the group; potential legal/privacy exposure depending on jurisdiction/content.
Current Situation:
Reassurance is given (anonymity, no names, meetings not recorded) but participants still request a meeting to clarify visibility, next steps, and who sees what; public video/Facebook discussion increases risk.
Action Strategy:
Create a one-page "PHC Port Confidentiality & Publishing Options" guide (audience levels, anonymity options, time-delay, approval workflow); add explicit consent and approval step before publishing; define retention/deletion/redaction rules.
Concern Category:
Safeguarding
Location:
Analysis: Not available
No snapshots found.