Description:
A participant questions why Egora is being mentioned; another states the Human Rights group is not connected to Egora, indicating confusion about affiliations and agendas.
Desired Outcome:
A crisp statement of identity: what the group is, what it is not connected to, and why PHC Port is involved (tooling/governance only).
What Could Go Wrong:
Suspicion about hidden agendas; derailment into side debates; disengagement by participants.
Current Situation:
Boundary is asserted (not connected), but the mention triggers doubt and frustration.
Action Strategy:
Publish a short "About" paragraph for the group and the PHC Port support role; avoid referencing unrelated entities unless directly relevant and explained.
Concern Category:
Patient Safety
Location:
Analysis: Not available
No snapshots found.
[2025-12-28 10:22:06 - David Winter - new]