PHC Port | Order Efficiency | Golden Door | Simpleology | Garden Fleet
project_id: P456 - Defenders_of_Human_Rights - Concerns (23) Deliverables (1)





Concern #449 - Evidence Standard Confusion (Formal Advocacy vs Story Capture)

Description:
A claim is made that formal bodies (e.g., UN) may require media evidence, while current plans are personal testimony capture and Facebook posting, creating confusion about the intended evidentiary standard.

Desired Outcome:
Clarity on purpose and documentation levels: awareness storytelling vs structured documentation vs formal dossier, each with appropriate standards and disclaimers.

What Could Go Wrong:
Overclaiming credibility; contributors take risks believing content is "for the UN"; outsiders dismiss the effort as unserious; misunderstanding of what the output can be used for.

Current Situation:
Aspirational framing appears while processes remain informal and early-stage.

Action Strategy:
Define "levels of documentation" (Level 1 anonymous narrative; Level 2 timeline + artefacts; Level 3 formal dossier); avoid invoking external bodies unless standards are met; document intended use per output.

Concern Category:
Access to Justice

Location:

Analysis: Not available

No snapshots found.

Comments for this Concern Item



No comments found.