PHC Port | Order Efficiency | Golden Door | Simpleology

Project: P378 - Dispossessed - [Croyde Timeshare] - Concerns (3) Events (10)



Concern #83 - Unlawful Disposal of Timeshare Property Without Co-owner Consent.

Description:
The trustees of the Croyde Bay Holiday Ownership Club, via Slee Blackwell LLP, claim ignorance of property redevelopment activities at the Croyde Bay complex initiated by Mr. Saltmarsh. This includes the sale (subject to contract) of the pool area and the potential demolition of Lundy, a property still under long-term contractual ownership by timeshare holders. Despite holding a 977-year right to Week 33 in Lundy, the undersigned were not informed or consulted regarding any sale or change in property status. The trustees appear to be using the alleged 2021 termination of the Club (Croyde Bay Holiday Ownership Club) as a basis to abdicate their legal responsibilities.

Desired Outcome:
1. Halt on redevelopment of properties pending resolution of timeshare ownership.
2. Recognition of 1993 ownership agreement enduring validity.
3. Affected co-owners share decisions on profit distribution relating to the shared asset.
4. Accountability from the trustees and, if necessary, financial compensation via their legal representatives.

What Could Go Wrong:
1. Timeshare owners stripped of property rights without compensation.
2. Legal agreements ignored, undermining trust in trustee governance.
3. Trustees escape responsibility through administrative loopholes.
4. Precedent for developers to erode multi-party ownership protections.

Current Situation:
Property appears to be under offer, with Lundy potentially marked for demolition. The trustees deny knowledge and reference the 2021 “termination” of the Club as a rationale for disengagement. Ownership documents remain in effect and unaltered.
Co-owners consulted for coordinated response.

Action Strategy:
1. Maintain communication with trustees and demand formal recognition of continued ownership rights.
2. Launch PHC Concern to identify and unite similarly affected parties.
3. Engage Legal Ombudsman and other regulators.
4. Initiate public awareness campaign if inaction continues.
5. Investigate legal grounds for restraining order or injunction on redevelopment activity.

Concern Category:
Legal

Location:
UK

Analysis: Open Mindmap for C00083

Snapshot History
C00083_250918.pdf
C00083_250630.pdf
C00083_250625.pdf

Comments for this Schedule Item



No comments found.