Description:
One party intended to record and post without editing, while the contributor says unedited posting could be a disaster and requests editing ability if necessary.
Desired Outcome:
A defined editing approach: editing allowed (review + trim/redact), or if no-edit is required then content must be strictly general, pre-scoped, and short-form.
What Could Go Wrong:
Oversharing or emotional/misspoken content goes public permanently; contributor refuses to participate; backlash or harm to contributor.
Current Situation:
Editing is explicitly requested; contributor is only comfortable speaking generally; organiser initially planned no editing.
Action Strategy:
Adopt a light workflow: record ? speaker review ? publish; if "no editing" is preferred, use structured prompts, pre-agreed boundaries, shorter segments, and re-takes for clarity.
Concern Category:
Safeguarding
Location:
Analysis: Not available
No snapshots found.