Project:
456 - Defenders_of_Human_Rights
Description:
One party sets a boundary ("not a therapist") while the contributor seeks a psychologically safe test run and feedback due to anxiety and sensitivity.
Desired Outcome:
Clear role boundaries plus basic safeguarding practices: documentation interview with consent gates; emotional support is optional and signposted elsewhere.
What Could Go Wrong:
Misaligned expectations cause conflict; organiser feels burdened or accused; participant feels unsupported and withdraws.
Current Situation:
Boundary is stated, but contributor requests a private run-through and feedback review due to sensitivity.
Action Strategy:
Agree session purpose explicitly; add safeguarding-lite practices (pacing, stop option, consent checks, avoid pressure language); optional signposting to support resources.
Concern Category:
R8 Political / Government
Location:
Analysis: Not available
No snapshots found.